Rapid-fire technology Q&A

Frankly, the blog needed to be dusted off just a bit. It’s been a big week with technology announcements, so I’ll take a moment to put together some quick thoughts in a question-and-answer format. I reserve the right to be wrong about all of this and my opinions are just my own.

 

Q: What do you think of the iPad Mini?

A: I’ve read several articles and tweets about this device. Initial reaction seems to be reserved at best. I’m a bit struck by the frustration over the $329 price point. Perhaps Apple is a victim of its own success, as the market seems to be flooding with affordable devices of various shapes, sizes and capabilities. Not many people purchased a MacBook because it was cheaper. Apple’s philosophy has traditionally been something like “…hey, we believe we make a better product and users will pay more for higher quality.”

 

To some extent, that changed with the iPad. Users were amazed by the quality and features and also by the $500 price point. As Android-based options surfaced, most were in the same pricing neighborhood as the iPad and with the quality of the product and popularity of the iTunes store, many users have decided that the negligible price savings is not worth the loss in features.

 

Fast forward to the smaller tablet market. Google and Amazon had their own customer “wow” moments with their feature sets crammed into a product at the $200-25o price point.  This seems to be a price point where small differences matter. I’m not sure how many people are willing to pay $329 for a product that some would argue is on par with something in the $200-250 range. The other challenge is the continued existence of the iPad 2 at the $399 price point. Why pay $329 for an iPad Mini if I can get a $399 iPad 2? Of course, that could mean that the ‘solution’ is to stop offering the $399 iPad 2 option.

 

Q: What do you think about Microsoft’s Windows 8 and the Surface tablet?

A: Most of the technology ‘buzz’ indicates that Microsoft is staking a LOT on Windows 8. Conceptually, I can see where Microsoft has to do something. The slow decline of the PC as we know it is well underway. Are users aching for a tablet that runs “Windows”, that is perhaps more compatible with the business networks, that has USB and MicroSD and video connectivity? I’m not sure. I DO think some business users will have interest in a tablet that runs Microsoft Office. However, what about the true Windows 8 version… the version that “…integrates with your existing enterprise management infrastructure…?” If that version is too expensive, administrators will be faced with a Windows-based tablet that doesn’t truly integrate or be faced with what they already have today, which are iOS- or Android-based devices that don’t truly integrate with the rest of the environment. Microsoft has its past to overcome. Apple, for whatever past flaws it may have had, presented itself as a hip and trendy option with well-designed products that you were convinced that you needed. Can Microsoft, with its traditionally business-oriented background, convince its users that Windows 8 with Surface tablets are what you really need? We’ll see. It’s an uphill climb, but Microsoft has the financial resources including many cryptocurrencies acquired form markets like skrumble. The Surface could be an XBox or could be a Zune.

 

Q: What else might be on the horizon?

A: I think we’ll see a PC maker decide to get out of that business (or go out of business). HP seemed to be headed down that road for a brief time. A change in leadership led to a change in message and their PC business remains. IBM sold their PC business to Lenovo years ago.  I can go to a big-box store and buy an Apple, HP, Dell, Lenovo, Asus, Acer, Gateway, Toshiba, Sony or Samsung PC. Of course, Gateway bought eMachines and Acer bought Gateway, so maybe some brand consolidation will occur. As this report indicates, it’s a tough time to be in the PC business.

 

So much for rapid fire… That’s all I have time for right now. Later!

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *